Dr. Gabor Maté on Attachment and Addiction
March 28, 2016
By Sat Dharam Kaur (http://beyondaddiction.ca/author/sdk/)
When it comes to addiction, I’m going to introduce the word ‘attachment’ to you. Attachment is an interesting
word, because it has two meanings. If you want to talk in terms of negatives and positives, it has the negative
meaning of clinging, or craving, or grasping onto ideas, behaviours, substances, relationships, or situations that are
negative for us. In fact, that’s the denition of addiction; any behaviour that gives you temporary pleasure, relief,
that you crave, that you cling to despite negative consequences, is an addiction.
In other words, addictions are a form of what the Buddhists call attachment. We’re just too attached, or we’re
attached period. Whenever it talks about clinging or attachment, it’s to everything; our form, our bodies, our esh,
our ideas, our perceptions, and our relationships. It’s that clinging that creates suffering. The rst ‘noble truth’,
that life is suffering, has to do with the fact that life is suffering because we cling, and we crave, and we’re
attached.
Since life is, by denition, impermanent – in fact, non-permanence is a truth, therefore the loss of the things that
we’re attached to create suffering for us. As soon as you cling, you’re going to suffer; as soon as you crave and get
attached to anything, you’re going to suffer. The rst ‘noble truth’ is the fact of suffering itself; second is that the
source of suffering is the clinging and the craving, which is to say, in a broad sense, addiction.
‘Addiction’, the word, comes from a Latin word for somebody who’s a slave. Addiction by denition means ‘slavery’,
which is to say you’re not in charge. You’re a slave; you’re not in charge, the craving is in charge, the clinging is in
charge. So when you do the rst step in the twelve step program, you admit that you’re powerless; you admit that
you’re a slave to something bigger than yourself.
So that’s the Buddhist sense of attachment, but it’s very interesting because in modern psychology we also talk
about attachment. But when we talk about attachment in modern psychology, what are we talking about?
Connection. We’re talking about a relationship. We’re talking about a very dynamic without which life is
impossible; attachment in the sense of love, attachment in the sense of the biological drive for closeness and
proximity to another human being for the purpose of being taken care of, or for the purpose of taking care of the
other. So attachment is the dynamic that pulls two bodies together, just like gravity, and its essential survival
purpose is the taking care of, or being taken care of. You can actually see, at the beginning of life and at the end of
life, that without attachment there is no life.
So you have this very positive sense of attachment, this closeness, for caregiving purposes. Then you have the
other meaning of attachment, which is the clinging that makes you addicted and creates suffering. There’s a deep
and powerful relationship between the two forms of attachment. In fact, it’s the absence of the one kind of
attachment that creates the other kind of attachment. In other words, when our attachment needs as young
children and infants are not met, we compensate for that by creating an attachment to things that can’t possibly
satisfy us but momentarily give us the sense of satisfaction.
That is what an addiction is: something that momentarily gives you a sense of satisfaction, but ultimately creates
suffering. It’s the lack of one kind of attachment that creates the other kind of attachment. The less attachment
you had as an infant and young child, the more attachments you’re going to have as an adult. The less of the
positive attachment, the more of the negative attachment. By positive I mean attachment that creates peace,
strength, self-awareness, presence, and groundedness, and by negative attachment I mean all that undermines
this satisfaction, groundedness, or presence.
We judge ourselves for our negative attachments, but I’m suggesting we approach it differently. I’m suggesting
that we approach our negative attachments, which is to say our addictions, not as something as we should judge as
bad or as something that we should be ashamed of, but recognizing that they are our attempts to compensate for
the attachments that we didn’t get. As soon as you understand that, you have compassion for the creature that
didn’t get the attachment that she needed, or he needed, and therefore developed this craving, which is the other
kind of attachment.
The addiction, if you will, or the negative attachment, the harmful attachment, can become a guide to the
attachment that you didn’t get in the rst place. Nothing to be ashamed of; as a matter of fact, a natural
consequence.
The above passage from Dr. Maté was recorded at a Beyond Addiction workshop in Vancouver in 2015.